Excellent Question! You need to find ways to synchronize your website’s architecture and all of your 301 redirects. I would point every one of them at the home page!

Why?

Lets take this website for instance; I have http://socialmediaoptimists.com set up to redirect to http://seosport.com using a 301 permanent redirect. Now since the keywords in this particular domain are Social, Media and Optimists you would think that I should have pointed the redirect to my Social Media page http://seosport.com/social-media/ but in fact that would be cutting my homepage out from having Google associate those keywords with my entire website.

Redirects work with the root of the domain very nicely, in fact if you try to enter our website using a redirect followed by a particular pages /exact-slug/ you will land on that exact page so pointing it to another page just cut out the rest of your domain from using that same redirect. Try going to my redirected domain http://socialmediaoptimists.com/social-media/ and you will land on the http://seosport.com/social-media/ page.

Now that you know this you can set up all of your redirects and add them to your link building efforts by doing the following:

1) Add your redirects to social bookmarks, website directories and blog comments so that they can crawl and index your redirected domains.

2) Get a premium dns service provider that can host all of your domains in one account that offers you the ability to fill in title, description and key words under each redirect record(I personally use dnsmadeeasy.com and it costs about $150 per year for all of my 200+ domains)

3) Add some of your redirects to your footer pointing right back at your domain using keyword relevant link text.

4) Use your redirects in email and web campaigns for tracking purposes(Google Analytics will show you how many people entered you domain coming from that domain).

5) Use your redirects in deep link building as well (ie. redirect.com/category/page-slug/)

By using your redirects in your on and off-page seo efforts you will not only be maximizing the use and getting the most out of your multiple domain purchases, but you will be allowing the search engines to associate the key words in those domain redirects with your targeted website. I have seen some of my published redirects show up on the front page of Google’s search results using this method.

Two things to remember is if they(search engines) cannot index the redirect somewhere then you just wasted money and time, also if you have a choice you should use “do follow” directories and blogs to publish your redirects(as long as they’re not spammy).

Originally posted as a comment
by jonathonhewitt
on SEO Sport | Search Engine Optimists | Social Media Enthusuasts using DISQUS.

Excellent Question! You need to find ways to synchronize your website’s architecture and all of your 301 redirects. I would point every one of them at the home page!

Why?

Lets take this website for instance; I have http://socialmediaoptimists.com set up to redirect to http://seosport.com using a 301 permanent redirect. Now since the keywords in this particular domain are Social, Media and Optimists you would think that I should have pointed the redirect to my Social Media page http://seosport.com/social-media/ but in fact that would be cutting my homepage out from having Google associate those keywords with my entire website.

Redirects work with the root of the domain very nicely, in fact if you try to enter our website using a redirect followed by a particular pages /exact-slug/ you will land on that exact page so pointing it to another page just cut out the rest of your domain from using that same redirect. Try going to my redirected domain http://socialmediaoptimists.com/social-media/ and you will land on the http://seosport.com/social-media/ page.

Now that you know this you can set up all of your redirects and add them to your link building efforts by doing the following:

1) Add your redirects to social bookmarks, website directories and blog comments so that they can crawl and index your redirected domains.

2) Get a premium dns service provider that can host all of your domains in one account that offers you the ability to fill in title, description and key words under each redirect record(I personally use dnsmadeeasy.com and it costs about $150 per year for all of my 200+ domains)

3) Add some of your redirects to your footer pointing right back at your domain using keyword relevant link text.

4) Use your redirects in email and web campaigns for tracking purposes(Google Analytics will show you how many people entered you domain coming from that domain).

5) Use your redirects in deep link building as well (ie. redirect.com/category/page-slug/)

By using your redirects in your on and off-page seo efforts you will not only be maximizing the use and getting the most out of your multiple domain purchases, but you will be allowing the search engines to associate the key words in those domain redirects with your targeted website. I have seen some of my published redirects show up on the front page of Google’s search results using this method.

Two things to remember is if they(search engines) cannot index the redirect somewhere then you just wasted money and time, also if you have a choice you should use “do follow” directories and blogs to publish your redirects(as long as they’re not spammy).

Originally posted as a comment
by jonathonhewitt
on SEO Sport | Search Engine Optimists | Social Media Enthusuasts using DISQUS.

Need help with your website’s search engine rankings? My name is Jonathon Hewitt and I am the founder of Seo Sport, LLC. as an experienced search engine strategist with almost a decade of internet marketing experience, I will work with your website to implement the Best SEO Strategy for your particular industry. Seo Sport strictly uses only the most ethical SEO techniques that are result-proven and industry approved. At Seo Sport we focus not only on getting your site to rank well with the search engines but on continuing to rank well for a long time to come. We take the extra steps that most of your fly-by-night SEO companies overlook, giving your company an upper hand when trying to beat the competition to that invaluable web traffic.

Search engine optimization (SEO) has been proven to be one of the most cost-effective forms of marketing today. With the internet growing there are millions of websites showing up on the World Wide Web every day, it is imperative for your company’s future success to have a serious SEO strategy in-place to assure your brand’s longevity in the marketplace. Many company owners say “oh thats a job my IT guy handles”, and let me reassure you that this is NOT a job for your “IT Guy”, you need a Search Engine Expert!

To truely optimize one must realize that search engine optimization covers just about every category of web developement in one way shape or form. When Seo Sport puts together a marketing strategy, there are some primary factors that we research heavily;

Measuring the effect of online marketing and PR efforts is essential for both understanding the return on investment but also for feedback that will improve subsequent efforts.  

Measuring the effect of SEO for Public Relations benefits should start with well defined outcomes. To get a good handle on SEO effectiveness, it’s important to match the purpose for the effort with specific metrics.  For example, if improving brand visibility is a goal, then documenting brand mentions in connection with news & PR content at regular intervals can demonstrate the effect of content promotion and link building. 

Online PR metrics and tools often include:

  • News wire service metrics (see screen capture below)
  • Web analytics for landing pages and web site
  • Google and Yahoo alerts
  • Monitor blog search engines (via RSS)
  • Press release landing page conversion tracking
  • Social media monitoring
  • Inbound links
  • Pickups on blogs
  • Pickups on other web sites & online publications
  • News and Standard Search Engine Rankings
  • Conversions: Less likely sales, more likely white paper downloads, webinar signups, newsletter subscriptions, demos, etc

prweb stats

As I’ve mentioned, the specific metrics and tools to use should match the news content being optimized and it’s purpose. For example, a press release that is keyword optimized and announcing a promotional offer of some kind, should have tracking codes added to the links embedded in the release. Those links should point to landing pages designed to convert visitors from the press release to the desired outcome. Ranking is not a worthwhile metric in this case but conversions are.

Capturing various measures and key performance indicators isn’t enough to gain support for optimizing news content in many organizations.  These efforts belong within the Public Relations effort and should emphasize goals consistent with PR objectives. Sometimes it takes a little creative packaging of analytics to help other departments or upstream executives “get” the value of  optimizing PR content for search.

Here are a few tactics to use in order to sell the value of SEO within a PR effort:

  • Show competitor social search visibility vs client/company
  • Show competitor’s optimized news content ranking in various types of search engines where the company/client is not (and probably should be)
  • Research a keyword glossary and run a ranking report on those phrases. Show the lack of search visibility for what search audiences are actually looking for, relevant to the business
  • Run a test of a few news items, whether they be blog posts, press releases or a digital asset like video. Take a benchmark measurement first and then show progress.
  • Set keyword ranking goals for news content and estimate the cost to achieve the same goals with PPC advertising over time. Demonstrate the cost of organic search traffic vs PPC traffic.  

If you can’t get budget approval for an overall search campaign as part of specific PR efforts, then using a competitive example or a small scale test might be enough to demonstrate the value of incorporating SEO with Public Relations.

That wraps up our series of posts on Top Ten SEO Tips for News and PR where you can find an index of all 10 posts as well as the PowerPoint deck that inspired it.

Please share your opinions on the series. Not just the content and whether it’s useful, but the the format of posting a themed series. Did you like the series? Was 10 posts too many?  Your feedback is greatly appreciated.

December 19, 2008

Suing Google Because Your Google Site Ranking Sucks

legal issues

legal issues

from the try-again dept via techdirt.com

A few years back, you may recall the “SearchKing” case, where Google penalized a search engine optimizer for gaming its system — a fairly common practice in the company’s ongoing attempts to keep search engine spammers out, while making searches more relevant. Well, in this case, the guy wasn’t too happy (and it certainly didn’t reflect well on his optimization technique), and he eventually sued Google. It didn’t take long at all for a judge to dismiss the case, noting that Google’s ranking was their opinion and, thus, protected free speech. However, with so many sites relying so much on Google, and the constant shifts in rankings, you knew it was only a matter of time before such a case popped up again. Google has now been sued by a firm that is upset at its ranking. While the article isn’t entirely clear, it sounds like this was a site that was entirely blacklisted, probably for its own aggressive search engine optimization techniques — and so they’re trying to set up a class action suit on behalf of all sites blacklisted by Google. This seems just as silly (and as likely to succeed) as the original case, but the lawyers this time are trying a slightly different argument. They’re suggesting that Google is an “essential facility” and by penalizing sites with no explanation and no recourse, they’re unfairly hurting businesses. Of course, proving Google as an “essential facility” may take a bit of work — and could open up the floodgates. The real issue is that, even though many companies do, relying on a single source as a way of driving business is always a risky position to be in. It’s a business decision to rely on Google, and not look for other methods of driving traffic. Google is an outside party and can do what they want. While many people do rely on Google, that doesn’t mean they have to do anything for other sites, other than try to keep their index as relevant as possible to keep their users happy.

96 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)


  1. Real goal

    by Joe Smith – Mar 17th, 2006 @ 6:02pm

    The Plaintiff’s real goal may be to simply force Google through the discovery process to tell them what the Google ranking algorithm is.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  2. Techdirt editors ignore visitors… news at NEVER

    by TJ – Mar 17th, 2006 @ 6:34pm

    Have the Techdirt editors spent any time reading the 160+ comments about the site redesign? If they have, they are ignoring us. Either pay attention to our feedback, or don’t accept feedback at all. As it is, they are doing nothing but wasting our time.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  3. Google Rankins, #1 or #2 or #3 or even #4,567,890

    by Happy User – Mar 17th, 2006 @ 6:34pm

    scenario #1: ok, so when the trial is over, this company gets knowladge of why they were blacklisted from google’s usage listing in the first place… and remains off the google’s search list. big whoop.

    scenario #2: The company gets onto google’s search ranking and is #1 for a day – until they get shuffled in a relevancey order, in which case the company will remain #1 or #2 or #3 or even #4,567,890 for a particular term.

    scenario #3: The company gets on to google again and no one searches for the company other than to badmouth it for it’s low low low attack methods.

    scenario #4: The company wins the case and Google has to pay out a class action suit on behalf of all sites blacklisted by from Google. How is any company to claim “lost income” by relevancy of search engines? If that was possible, then wouldn’t anyone listed in Google be able to determine their $$$ growth over the upcoming years – based SOLELY upon being listed (i mean “ranked by”) Google’s search engine… by relevance of end-user’s search term.

    scenario #5: This is St.Patty’s day – and I guess this a weekend-post regarding [GREEN] money… or I’m way off on everything, eh?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  4. Re: Techdirt editors ignore visitors… news at NE

    by Mike – Mar 17th, 2006 @ 6:41pm

    Have the Techdirt editors spent any time reading the 160+ comments about the site redesign? If they have, they are ignoring us. Either pay attention to our feedback, or don’t accept feedback at all. As it is, they are doing nothing but wasting our time.

    This is not the spot for this, but since you asked it here…

    We have spent the week gathering all the feedback and have been implementing a number of changes. Please be patient. Many of the changes are already in place and more are coming shortly. However, we want to test things to make sure they work properly.

    The VAST majority of the feedback has been positive. There are a few changes that enough people wanted that we will be implementing shortly.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. by jdragon – Mar 17th, 2006 @ 7:00pm

    Wouldn’t it cheaper to just use PPC like adword to advertise than say…pay the lawyer fees?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. by Susheel – Mar 17th, 2006 @ 7:29pm

    They don’t have very good lawyers if they argued ‘essential facilities’. That doctrine was dismissed with prejudice by the S.Ct. several years ago….

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  7. KinderStart.Com Sues Google

    by Ted – Mar 17th, 2006 @ 7:50pm

    I think you guys are jumping to alot of conclusions here. Try reading the complaint first, then comment away, I read the complaint, and there is more there than meets the eye. These guys do not look like they are out for themselves. Read the complaint then decide. BTW, per the complaint, they never did any optimization. I think it is wise to with-hold judgement to you get more information. The truth will come out, and- yes- there are two sides- KinderStart and Googles and perhaps others;)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  8. KinderStart suing Google

    by CE – Mar 17th, 2006 @ 8:48pm

    KinderStart is suing Google is ridiculous…To rely on Google for people to find your site means that the company does not want to spend any money on marketing. If they market themselves to their target group, then people can find their site. Why not send their link to their customers? That’s another way to generate hits on their site.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  9. violating tos

    by Anonymous Coward – Mar 17th, 2006 @ 8:58pm

    simple – they probly did what every other company that gets blacklisted did, use seo techniques that violate google’s tos for being on their search listing

    you break the rules, you pay accordingly, why do they expect to be treated any differenlty?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  10. by Andyware – Mar 17th, 2006 @ 9:06pm

    Americans are funny!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  11. Demolition Man

    by WhoNu – Mar 17th, 2006 @ 9:36pm

    Remember the movie Demolition Man? Is google really the Taco Bell of the future?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  12. Hmm

    by Darknet – Mar 17th, 2006 @ 10:33pm

    I hope you mean that it’s no longer going to fixed width Mike :)

    And with regards to this article, Google has money now, these kinds of cases are going to pop up every couple of weeks..

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  13. America RULEZ!!

    by icepick314 – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 2:14am

    Welcome to the Land of Freedom and the Frivolous Lawsuits!!

    We can sue for hot coffee, bad air, and free search enegines!!!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  14. by Guest – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 4:20am

    May be, he wants advertise by creating a sensation

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  15. by NOCcer – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 5:05am

    Seems like another case of a company suing for something rediculous for the free advertising.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  16. by NOCcer – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 5:08am

    KinderStart alleges Google has engaged in anticompetitive behavior and misled the public by positioning its search engine as an objective source for finding Internet content. The suit seeks unspecified financial damages and a court order that would require Google to change its ways.

    So Google is in the child education business now?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  17. Again

    by Pimptology Professor – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 6:54am

    Wow, google is makin an apalling list of enemie, i guess the unwritte rule about fame: The higher you rise, the faster u fall, is going to apply to google in the near future.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  18. Uncle Ben says…

    by farlane – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 7:04am

    Interesting to see this article this morning as I have been trying to detail how the Google rankings and referrals for one of our sites has been plummetting and to figure out how to discuss this with Google (though there seems to be no recourse when you have been found guilty by the court of Google).
    It looks as if Kinderstart.com is a database-driven, link-heavy site. Our Absolute Michigan site is as well.
    Google seems to be penalizing such sites heavily. The rationale I have heard is that many of these are merely sites created to snare traffic (and reap Adword revenue – how ironic is that?). What that rationale ignores is sites which are truly seeking to become trusted guides to a subject area, something that Google is very poor at.
    Don’t believe me? Search “Michigan links” and ask if there is any logical reason that the “Militia Links” or “Northport, Michigan: Links” site should have a higher ranking than our Ab Mich site for that query. 6 months ago, we were number one. We have added thousands of more links to REAL web sites and yet our ranking falls.
    Google wields enormous power and we all know that means they bear enormous responsibility.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  19. Evil corporations!

    by Deverill – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 7:18am

    If I pay for a newspaper classified ad they can put it in any order they want and I’m paying for it. How much more right does a free service have to order listings as they wish?

    Besides that, Google only promises to do things the way they want to – there is no contract with the listed site’s owners to be fair and equitable.

    Sounds like this site was reaping benefits from Google’s generosity and when it changed they got upset.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  20. Re: Uncle Ben says…

    by ben – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 7:52am

    Your site provides no content per se, you just link to other sites; if you bothered to learn anything about Google’s ranking, you’d have known that you’re only increasing the rank of sites you link to, and do nothing for your own website.

    You want high Google rank? Put up a website with meaningful content, get other people’s websites on similar topic to link to your website, and watch your rank climb.

    Directory-style sites are passe, we don’t need them anymore – we have Google!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  21. RE: Uncle Ben

    by Paul -V- – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 8:17am

    Your site is little more than a link farm. No wonder you are not doing well.

    Try writing some new content every once in a while.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  22. Re: Uncle Ben says…

    by Greg – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 8:27am

    Sites that are just link junkyards should be blacklisted. It’s frustrating to search for something and the top sites are just a bunch of links. I’m not searching to find links, I’m searching to find actualy sites. I don’t want to keep going through an endless circle of links…!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  23. Re: RE: Uncle Ben

    by farlane – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 8:39am

    Hey Paul, try digging a little deeper. Take for example Bill Could Have Grave Implications for Michigan’s State Forests. Links to the story and the bill content and provides a summary of the news. You can also click (for example) “Sports & recreation > Parks” from related categories to find a links to parks that might be impacted by this story. And Oh look, there’s more articles about parks.

    The resources have been reviewed by HUMAN eyes and are all in Michigan – and all authentic sites. Try a google search for “Michigan parks” and see what you get.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think that’s a useful service.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  24. Re: Re: RE: Uncle Ben

    by Anwar – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 8:54am

    But still google does that it has links to parks that could he impacted by that particular story.

    Why should someone include you in their database of records if they dont want you in it?
    to put that another way
    Do you expect a woman who doesnt want to have sex to be forced to have sex?

    Gopogle like women, have rights, unfortunately

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  25. Re: Re: Re: RE: Uncle Ben

    by farlane – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 9:16am

    I completely agree that google has links to parks in Michigan and when I’m looking for a specific park, that’s where I go. Like the vast majority of folks on this site, I am versed in google-fu. Everyone in the world is not, however.

    My point is that when somebody is looking for “Michigan parks”, they are more than likely unsure of anything more than they are looking for a park in Michigan. For that search and state of mind, a site like ours works better than the site for a specific Michigan park.

    Our team knows the state of Michigan and spends hours every day weeding through the mass of news and information to distill essential items as we see them. We forge connections between stories and REAL businesses, organizations and individuals. To be artificially penalized for doing this is (in my opinion) wrong.

    While you are correct that there is no grounds to force google to include a site in its database, the fact remains that Google wields a vast and largely unchecked power to control what gets seen and what doesn’t. I suppose if you agree with their decisions, then it desn’t matter who they’re censoring.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  26. Google’s responsibility

    by Joe Smith – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 9:41am

    is to its shareholders. It satisfies that responsibility by providing searches that give users what they want. Goolge’s ranking algorithms will be driven by the need to satisfy the users doing searches. It has no responsbility to the sites which want to be ranked by Google.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  27. Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Uncle Ben

    by Anonymous Coward – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 9:45am

    Plus, if they really are censoring great sites, we’d all just find a search engine to replace them!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  28. Re: Techdirt editors ignore visitors… news at NE

    by Saint Jerome – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 10:09am

    Calm down. Who are you to think the the Techdirt editors should listen to your comments on the redesign. This is a private website. If you don’t like it, leave.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  29. Suing Google Because Your Google Site Ranking Suck

    by webmetricsguru – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 10:39am

    What else is new, everyone wants to sue Google these days. According to an article in Siliconvalley.com Google Inc.’s mysterious methods for ranking Web sites came under attack Friday in a lawsuit accusing the online search engine leader of ruining scores of Internet businesses that have been wrongfully banished from its index. I can count on my two hands the number of Google updates that have occured in the last two years and everytime any search engine does an update some results change. The civil complaint, filed in U.S. District Court in San Jose by KinderStart.com, seeks to be certified as a class action representing the owners of all Web sites blacklisted by Google’s Internet-leading search engine since January 2001. KinderStart, a Norwalk-based Web site devoted to information about children, says it was dropped from Google’s index a year ago without warning. “The world is becoming increasingly ‘Googlized,’” said Gregory Yu, a lawyer for KinderStart. “For most people, that has been a good thing, but not for everyone.” A Google spokesman said the company hadn’t seen the suit and had no immediate comment. Some of this is true – it’s hardly new and most of us have accepted it and moved on. KinderStart’s lawsuit alleges Google’s policing efforts have penalized Web sites that have done nothing wrong. To make matters worse, the suit alleges the banished sites can’t determine how they can restore their standings because the company doesn’t explain its actions. This is also true – lots of time sites drop out and it’s not clear why that happened or even when it happened. I believe there are plans in the works to notify webmasters when Google discovers a problem in their sites that might end up excluding the site from Google’s index – but to my knowledge – it’s not a live program yet. KinderStart said its traffic plunged by 70 percent after Google dropped it. At its peak, KinderStart’s visitors viewed more than 10 million Web pages per month, according to the suit. I can believe that – many sites traffic have become inflated with traffic from Google – if Google’s traffic were, somehow to go away, and nothing were there to replace it with – the economic effect could cripple the world economy in the short term.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  30. Re: Techdirt editors ignore visitors… news at NE

    by srgtick – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 11:51am

    I want what I want now!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  31. pfffft

    by hazelbyte – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 1:59pm

    It seems a shame to me that people think like this:
    > I want what I want now!

    Both with regard to the forum and with regard to the case.
    Both topics are about folks which solve their problems by demanding louder. Even children learn that this is not appropriate or constructive. In an adult world it means the US leads the world
    restricting our freedoms in order to comply with people who
    cannot negotiate responsibly. Sometimes you have right of way, sometimes you dont. You are responsible for honoring that in order to have a free society.
    A free society is one where you understand that other people need to have right of way, this is the means that you sometimes have right of way. You are responsible for negotiating in ways which
    do not reduce the freedoms of others.
    Both threads are tantrums. Learn to value your freedom, and that of others, operate your businesses and communications in ways which see things from the perspective of other people, avoid suing people to reduce those freedoms for all of us.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  32. I wish a lawsuit

    by Anonymous Coward – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 3:06pm

    I wish a lawsuit would be filed to keep the annoying pages off of their engines that are nothing more than keyword scares to do nothing more than show you a page with even more ads and adword links. Google doesn’t care because they are selling ads to companies who might not show up near the top.

    Think about it. Rankings change regularly because sites that are at the top of a search give those site owners a taste of what high traffic can do. What happens when the site then drops off? The site owner gets desparate and possibly gives Google money (via adwords) so they will show up again on the first page of a search.

    They MUST protect their algorithm because if people found out that it’s quite simplistic and mainly used to drive businesses to their ad programs, even more lawsuits would ensue.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  33. Re: pfffft

    by Mekales – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 4:15pm

    BRAVO!! BRAVO!!

    I’m standing and cheering your comment! So many in this “land of the free” believe that the world “owes” them and have no concern of the “cost” to others. That is the trend in our government, right down to the way people behave in the aisles of the supermarket. It’s deplorable the “ME, ME, ME” society that we Americans have become. Many other countries are laughing, ‘Those FREE Americans don’t understand what the term or theory of FREEDOM really means.’

    Thank you for stating the simple truth.

    Mekales

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  34. by DreadedOne509 – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 6:05pm

    It is greed, plain and simple. Our tort laws need to be revamped, rewritten or thrown out and started over. It has become the haves vs. the have-not’s-but-will-sue-to-get-it way to get ahead.

    If the company can’t survive without a good ranking on Google, they probably would not survive anyway.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  35. Re: Uncle Ben says…

    by Bored – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 7:34pm

    “Google wields enormous power and we all know that means they bear enormous responsibility.”

    No, actually, they don’t. They’re a private company. They don’t charge for their information. They have a 1st Amendment right to publish their opinion. If you don’t like it, tough. If you rely on their opinion for your business model, also tough. Try advertising.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  36. Re: It is greed, plain and simple.

    by Dean Hougen – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 7:46pm

    Our tort laws certainly need to be revamped but if you believe the only problem with them is that the have-not’s [sic] sue the haves to get rich, then you’ve been bamboozled by the haves. Often the problem is that the haves are suing the have-nots.

    “But,” you ask, “why would the haves sue the have-nots? The have-nots don’t have enough money to be worth suing!”

    I’m glad you asked. The have-nots don’t have much money but they do have voices and often the haves want to silence them. For example, I’ve seen many cases where have-nots have given open, honest, factual accounts of bad experiences they have had with companies, only to have the companies come after them with lawsuits to shut them up and to shut up anyone else who might be tempted to give an honest account of their bad experiences with the company. The result is often just what the poorly behaving haves want–lots of have-nots who censor themselves and spread the word to each other that they should all censor themselves, lest they be sued by the haves.

    So, argue for tort reform all you want but do so with the knowledge that the strong sometimes prey on the weak and our system is set up by the strong to make that possible.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  37. Re: Re: Uncle Ben says…

    by Tyshaun – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 7:53pm

    “Google wields enormous power and we all know that means they bear enormous responsibility.”

    No, actually, they don’t. They’re a private company. They don’t charge for their information. They have a 1st Amendment right to publish their opinion. If you don’t like it, tough. If you rely on their opinion for your business model, also tough. Try advertising.

    You may be right, I’m not an attorney, however, this resonates to me on the same level as people suing Microsoft or the old Bell Telephone (before the breakup). Even if you are a private company, if your business becomes so ubiquitous or indispensible that people can’t do without it, then the the case for anti-trust may be used. There are lots of search engines but one could argue that the popularity and universal acceptance of the google site may have made it the Microsoft of searching. Just a thought.(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  38. Re: Re: Techdirt editors ignore visitors… news a

    by Anonymous Coward – Mar 18th, 2006 @ 8:14pm

    shut the fuck up ass hole if you dont like leave

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  39. Uncle Ben Says…

    by Dan – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 1:57am

    We get that your michigan website has links to all kinds of various other web pages regarding Michigan. But here’s the thing, if you type in “Michigan Parks” into google, what you get is a list of links. It’s skipping a step. Why go to your website through google to find more links when we’ve already got 10 million in front of us?

    What I’m really trying to grasp here is how this company intends to prove that google owes it because it’s been blacklisted. Let’s say, for instance, I have a lot of friends–and I do. I go to a resturant and eat, I then judge that the food is horrible or maybe someone who worked there was a prick or something, right? So I tell my friends, about my experience or maybe they ask me if I’ve been to the resturant, in which case I would then tell them not to go, or simply just say “I wouldn’t reccomend it.” Can the resturant then sue me because I’ve somehow damaged their business by not reccomending it to a friend?

    What I’m really saying is, how can they blame google for their lack of business? There are plenty of other ways out there to advertise. They don’t pay google to advertise their website, google is not the only way to access their website. So how can google owe them anything?

    Now, if the internet as a whole just up and decided to not let anyone access that website (which I’m pretty sure is just about impossible). Then maybe they would have a case (just not one against google, though).

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  40. This analayis or lack thereof

    by Matt Sherwood – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 3:14am

    This thread was one of the least perceptive and revealing I have EVER read on TechDirt.

    I attribute this to the educational background of the typical TECHDIRT contributor.

    All “tech”, no poli sci, no sociology, very llttle economcs other than Econ 101 knee-jerk “free-market” jingoism.

    I charge these contribors with stepping back, taking some time, and really thinking HARD about Google’s role in Modern Society and its massive success; and given that role, and that massive success, its attendant substantial SOCIETAL OBLIGATIONS…

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  41. Except Tyshaun

    by Matt Sherwood – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 3:28am

    Except for Tyshaun Mar 18th, 2006 7:53 p.m.

    She or he gets the KEY point.

    As well, she or he writes much more fluently, tactfully, and gracefully than the the other contribtors.

    These two things go hand-in-hand.

    I highly supsect that Tyshaun took a LARGE does of humanities while in college; boy do I wish I could say the same about the rest of you.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  42. Re: America RULEZ!!

    by we was free – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 4:29am

    Not too long back when i was just a little boy we was free to do as we won’t and say what ever we won’t too.
    but come too think about it it was a long time a go………..
    i don’t think we are free any more????

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  43. Has anyone actually viewed this site, lately..?

    by WB – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 5:49am

    To expound a little on CE’s comment, above … their site doesn’t appear to be very search-engine crawler friendly; perhaps the KinderStart folks are upset because they built a sloppy site, and want miracles in return..?

    Or could it be the link farm they have listings for sale on, built into their front page..?

    Just my take..

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  44. What Bored said:

    by Yoop – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 6:01am

    Post: “Google wields enormous power and we all know that means they bear enormous responsibility.”

    Bored: No, actually, they don’t.

    Ummm…so having enormous power means not bearing responsiblilty? Well what a beautiful world we’d live in if everyone thought that. Come on. They’re a private corp. so they the have no responibility…beautiful.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  45. Re: Uncle Ben says…

    by Avery – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 6:12am

    Don’t believe me? Search “Michigan links” and ask if there is any logical reason that the “Militia Links” or “Northport, Michigan: Links” site should have a higher ranking than our Ab Mich site for that query. 6 months ago, we were number one. We have added thousands of more links to REAL web sites and yet our ranking falls.

    One of the key criteria Google uses to rank sites is the sites popularity. There are 1,430 sites in the Google index that link to constitution.org but only 129 sites that link to absolutemichigan.com.(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  46. Re: This analayis or lack thereof

    by Joe Smith – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 7:17am

    I attribute this to the educational background of the typical TECHDIRT contributor.

    Well aren’t you special.

    If people disagree with you its because they are ignorant. That must be very comforting.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  47. Need better ranking in a search engine?

    by Searchman – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 10:24am

    Try the new search engine Xista.com. Its quick and easy to submit a page or site.

    www.xista.com

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  48. Re: Real goal

    by Andrew Strasser – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 10:27am

    Interesting idea…

    Search functions are easy to find but to figure out someone else’s alogrithm is quite the feat.

    Though i still believe Google is in the business of making money. My 2 ents. For what it’s worth which ain’t much it seems.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  49. Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Uncle Ben

    by Andrew Strasser – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 10:44am

    “While you are correct that there is no grounds to force google to include a site in its database, the fact remains that Google wields a vast and largely unchecked power to control what gets seen and what doesn’t. I suppose if you agree with their decisions, then it desn’t matter who they’re censoring.”

    I’ve found Google doesn’t censor things as badly as some other entities out there that shouldn’t even censor a thing. Just take a Google-fu toward my direction once. You’ll see Google had me a copy of those pages as soon as I needed them even when they disappeard. I don’t want a link farm Google finds what is being looked for if you word yourself correctly. That’s what i like about the service and you’re an idiot if you think that they have total control, because if so then those two ents that started as cents would have most likely been able to do something about what was being seen by not just me everyone around me at times.

    Bad Company to be messing with right now. They have a lot of power as they are working with our Govt., our Govt. forgot that a few times and needed to be retold that’s the only real problem. Google works as it’s supposed to it finds links not links to links to links. Check neurology you’ll love that section you idiot link farm owners.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  50. google and there right on sstage.

    by Alex – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 12:04pm

    suing google for some bull shet like this. google is providing the world with information for every one in the us and people acctually find time to do stupid things like this.. without ssearch engins your basiccallly left with people like that.. mother fu**ers. bitched.. oh can I ccursse on here.. well. fu*8 you people.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  51. Re: Uncle Ben Says…

    by farlane – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 12:35pm

    I get it that you get it, Dan & others. Sorry for digressing and for offending you with my sad little tale. The point isn’t “Wah – google’s not linking to me”. I’ll deal with that with Google (without lawyers cause I don’t like to get beat down by billion dollar legal teams).

    The point is that GOOGLE IS UBIQUITOUS. It is a verb. Paying attention to what Google is doing is a good idea since they are building the OS of the future — today.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  52. Re: Again

    by nb109 – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 1:09pm

    Pimptology Professor, you honestly believe that Google is going to fall in the near future?
    I think your rule about fame would more accurately be explained as “The higher you rise, the more people know of you, and so, the more enemies you aquire.”
    The reasons that others become your enemy, whether it be jealousy, a belief that you have, in some way, treated them unfairly, or whatever other reason the masses will invent, are irrelevent. There are whiners and complainers that have to throw a big hissy fit whenever they don’t get their way. The more people you become exposed to, the more of those ridiculous people you come in contact with.
    You will always have enemies. The more people that know you, the more enemies you have. Unfortunately, it’s a simple universal law.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  53. Re: Re: Uncle Ben Says…

    by Dan – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 1:14pm

    I don’t mean to say that the mighigan website isn’t worth going to or anything. If I’m ever thinking about going to Michigan, hell, I’ll go check it out. I guess I just really don’t understand how it is somehow Google’s responsibility to make sure every website on the internet gets fair coverage from the internet’s users.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  54. Re: Re: Techdirt editors ignore visitors… news a

    by nb109 – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 1:15pm

    Who are YOU to tell them how they should run their site. If you don’t like it you can:
    A) Leave.
    B) Create your own site that includes whatever ridiculous features that please your bossy, little mind.

    Also, why would you complain about your retarded feedback here in the comment section of a story? Does it not seem a bit out of place to you?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  55. Google lawsuit

    by Sterling – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 1:31pm

    Yet another reason why frivilous lawsuits clog the courts. Instead of trying to make their business serve people in a better way – THUS attracting more business – they decide to spend their advertising and marketing dollars to lay blame someone else for their poor business model.

    Aggressive, pushy – spamming – slamming – pop up windows, can’t close them without hitting “control escape” and the like deserve to suffer and should lose business UNTIL they get it right and play the game of good businesses that offer great products and services at a great price – no matter the price! It is up to them to drive up the “perceived” value as ALL pricing is a perception. If they don’t change – they deserve to lose business for they are responsible – not Google or anyone else!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  56. by Bo Allen – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 3:26pm

    People are idiots, and need to be slapped. Google is a giant, but a good giant, that provides VERY relevant search results, and offers fair game in their rankings. “Cheaters” are penalized, as they should be. GO GOOGLE!!!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  57. Re: Except Tyshaun

    by Matt but definitely not Matt Sherwood – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 4:11pm

    Thank you for showing me how un-educated I am. I would have gone the rest of my life without knowing the proper way to spell “dose” or that you can substitute a period with a semi-colon to end a sentence. Maybe if you would have had the wisdom to use spell checker, then your post might have had greater credibility?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  58. OMG

    by yhetheth – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 5:52pm

    Google rules. andheartssemicolon SAM THE MAN WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooo ooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    IM NOT HIGH : )

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  59. by some guy – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 7:07pm

    TESIV: Oblivion comes out tomorrow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  60. Re: Real goal

    by Michael Spadaccini – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 7:30pm

    That’s an interesting idea…but I am not so sure it will work. I believe that if the plaintiffs, in discovery, were to seek Google’s algorithms, Google could easily get an order to disclose the material only under a strong protective order–thereby rendering the information essentially useless.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  61. Re: Real goal

    by Michael Spadaccini – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 7:30pm

    That’s an interesting idea…but I am not so sure it will work. I believe that if the plaintiffs, in discovery, were to seek Google’s algorithms, Google could easily get an order to disclose the material only under a strong protective order–thereby rendering the information essentially useless.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  62. Frankly, it would be no surprise

    by Bill Wilson – Mar 19th, 2006 @ 9:04pm

    if this whole thing were just a rouse to get them to lay the case to rest with a ’settlement’. You know.. Sue for a bajillion dollars (Yes, a bajillion dollars IS a real amount.. in my head), and “let them’ settle for like 2 million, rather than fight the case for 5 million in the courts.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  63. Kinderstart.com BLOWS

    by Gizmo – Mar 20th, 2006 @ 12:33am

    Ok, heres something that just came to my attention, Kinderstart.com has a Google search engine on their site… If they were really pissed off at Google, would they or would they not take this portion of the site out? It also looks like this was made a hippy group of people who think “Saving the world, is righteous”… I think kinderstart.com is only out for money, again for the reason above makes no sense to have both a sue action + a google search engine on your site = $$$.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  64. I am matt, hear me roar

    by Matt Sherwood – Mar 20th, 2006 @ 4:27am

    And in addition, I like big sweaty men.


    This thread was one of the least perceptive and revealing I have EVER read on TechDirt.

    I attribute this to the educational background of the typical TECHDIRT contributor.

    All “tech”, no poli sci, no sociology, very llttle economcs other than Econ 101 knee-jerk “free-market” jingoism.

    I charge these contribors with stepping back, taking some time, and really thinking HARD about Google’s role in Modern Society and its massive success; and given that role, and that massive success, its attendant substantial SOCIETAL OBLIGATIONS…

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  65. I’m gonna sue kinderstart

    by Mike – Mar 20th, 2006 @ 6:30am

    because they don’t have my site ranked very well (hell they don’t have it ranked at all) among thier listings on thier link farm section. Kinderstart must have blacklisted my site from thier results. Isn’t that roughly equivelent of what they are doing with Google?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  66. This article really ranked up there!

    by Joel – Mar 20th, 2006 @ 8:16am

    Did anybody notice that the Google Ranking for this article was 0/10? Guess they didn’t think too highly of someone trashing their ranking system… “Oh yeah, you think our ranking system sucks. Well, we’ll just rank your little article a 0 out of 10! How do you like them apples?”

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  67. Re: This article really ranked up there!

    by Charlie Yeoh – Sep 16th, 2006 @ 11:22pm

    Well, actually this article now has a Google PageRank of 5/10. Must have gone up since your post.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  68. How about DMOZ

    by Julie – Sep 27th, 2006 @ 10:23am

    I’d like to see someone sue DMOZ. I think it is a big scam. Try getting listed in any category where your competition is choosing whether to list you or not – knowing that your rank in Google will be affected by it. If Google really cares about the relevancy of their results, they should do something about the way DMOZ operates to make it more useful.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  69. Re:

    by yangyang – Oct 6th, 2006 @ 2:27pm

    Or they could never have invented internet in the first place.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  70. Apalling list of enemie

    by Trading – Oct 22nd, 2006 @ 7:01am

    Wow – google is making an apalling list of enemie, I guess the unwritte rule about fame:the higher you rise, the faster you fall, is going to apply to google in the near future.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  71. Re: How about DMOZ

    by Kman – Oct 24th, 2006 @ 5:50pm

    I agree 100%. With so much at stake in terms of Google Rank, I wouldn’t be surprised if some companies were able to basically bribe a “independent editor” into listing their website, and quickly at that.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  72. Hot Heads or Brave Bucks?

    by Jenna Ryan – Dec 16th, 2006 @ 9:49pm

    I think it’s pretty brave. Who would do anything but kiss Google’s butt? They have the world by the ___ (you know what). Like, even the judge can be bribed by Google’s force, man. All hail, Google!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  73. i like google

    by matrimonial – Dec 18th, 2006 @ 11:19am

    i like google, they are playing big brother here but i feel they are playing it right

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  74. Msn Is Better Than Google In few cases

    by Finance Guide 101 – Jan 17th, 2007 @ 11:12pm

    In some cases MSN is better than google, well in future MSN can be a a good search engine for users.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  75. Strange…

    by Alex – Apr 11th, 2007 @ 5:05pm

    Very strange Situations! I Think its Probably only in America :) Many freedom is many promblems anywhere. The time of Madnesses is not far :)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  76. by Steve – Apr 21st, 2007 @ 2:24pm

    How many things will Google penalize your site for that they do on their own site? Sites that promote affiliate programs are penalized, yet Google runs one of the largest affiliate programs in the industry on their site. How many top ten results on Google are nothing but Ad-Words sites trying to collect a buck directing you to another site through the same listings you just saw on Google. Wake up people, Google now SUCKS – big time. If you think otherwise you’re a simplistic ass.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  77. Re: How about DMOZ

    by Rhys – Apr 26th, 2007 @ 9:26am

    I agree with Julie.

    It transpires that the editor for where I am endeavouring to submit is friends with the main competition – the incestuous links between their websites gives it away just a bit.

    20,000 copied webpages on the comptetitions website provides a bit more salt for the wound.

    Reported the abuse, however it now appears that the meta editor know the editor….

    Grrrrr

    Maybe a small group of people ought to provide an alternative and actually strive for the best directory on the web

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  78. Freedom

    by Filippo Biasini – Jun 5th, 2007 @ 4:34pm

    My freedom finishes where starts other people freedom

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  79. Madness

    by Andrew Payne – Jul 12th, 2007 @ 11:01pm

    When people or companies get caught trying to scam or fast track something just to make them money, they get upset and always try to sue. We need to promote a class on business/personal ethics.

    Andrew Payne

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  80. Lawsuit Google

    by Sonny – Jul 16th, 2007 @ 1:22pm

    Need Help, cause i seriously found cheat by Google.

    How to file a law suit again google? cause recently i encounter some problem with google.
    Story like below :

    I use to own Google adsense account since year 2006 (keep good fate on it), late 2006 my account reach USD 100 but i din’t withdraw it cause i understand is not worth to withdraw USD 100 for foreigner like me (bank charges, currency exchange) …..

    This year (2007) April i add another web site in my account and it do generate good profit (i happy with it), then at late Jun i bought over a website (7 year history with good traffic/pageview) then i add adsense in ….

    But today 17/07/2007 my account get disable and all my money gone …….

    So below is my question :
    1. How come google take away all my money ? (from 2006 till now).

    2. If there is afraud click or illegal activity, you surppose to ban the URL not my account. why ban (extra profit for google adsense) ?

    3.Google adsense how do you return all the money to the publisher since early year 2006 (i know cause i use adword) ?

    4. If i have illegal activity, taking out google adsense is the only solution, then why not taking out google search Bar ? (Goolge are not paying me, why should i advertis for google ? ).

    I need a clear answer from Google ….

    I found google Policy is not fair for user with low page view and do believe that is million user like me facing this problem …..

    Thanks god internet exit and i can search for more help.

    Thanks
    wish to hear your reply soon.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  81. great

    by Ivo – Dec 17th, 2007 @ 12:38pm

    i think i should do it as well)))

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  82. don’t sue google

    by vito – Jan 25th, 2008 @ 10:44pm

    start your own! mine is going to be called www.Ploose.com and its the world’s first comprehensive global nightlife directory!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  83. Re: Hot Heads or Brave Bucks?

    by Stephen – Mar 17th, 2008 @ 7:39am

    Interesting take on the article. Beware of Jenna Ryan

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  84. Suing Google

    by Jay Skinner – Apr 15th, 2008 @ 7:13am

    Well, I didn’t realized that people were suing Google because they didn’t agree with their page rank. Many companies are depending of their search engine position to stay in business.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  85. Hmmm…

    by Tom – May 10th, 2008 @ 12:37pm

    For those of you asking about an alternative to AdSense – try Chitika. Over the last year I compiled some statistics of my earnings and I actually earned twice as much with Chitika compared to AdSense. You can check out this Chitika review for more info and some cool screenshots.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  86. google doing what it wants

    by John Meshna – May 14th, 2008 @ 6:32pm

    Google may be it’s own entity and no one is forced to use it but, once a company gets an iron grip on and industry they warrant watching and as was the case with the phone company years ago, they need to be broken up so some competition can get into the market place. furthermore, if they take your money and charge you for displaying your advertising they should be required to show the advertising they’re taking the money for. I say this because, as of last week they have stopped showing all of my advertising but they continue to charge me for clicks. We have been typing in our key words all day for days now and none of our advertising is showing up in the paid areas. they are stealing and getting away with it because there is no outside auditing of this company. there is no independent way of verifying that anyone is getting one they are paying for with google. Google has become the mafia of the internet. They make the rules. they decide what the payolla will cost and you have no recourse but to pay and be shut up and out. This is organized crime.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  87. google doing what it wants

    by hdtvman – May 21st, 2008 @ 11:46am

    I think we as webmasters fail to realize that google ultimately has to answer to users who want relevant results.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  88. Google is King

    by adam freelance – May 21st, 2008 @ 9:08pm

    save your time unless you have a ton of money to go after Google. Google has the best lawyers, and if you are thinking of suing them, then you better have a ton of money or a rock solid case.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  89. Suing Google

    by Anna – Jun 25th, 2008 @ 3:56pm

    I personally think it’s ridiculous. What next – Google will say that we actually owe them money for all those years we were ranked in their SERPs? (After all, we made money because of Google and we didn’t pay them a thing!) I don’t think so.

    Google is it’s own website. I mean – nobody sues me for not listing their link on my blog! Anyway fine. I like Google. I think Google is fantastic.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  90. Be Careful About Frivolous Lawsuits!

    by Jonathan Richards – Aug 17th, 2008 @ 8:32am

    Suing others without a strong basis is frowned upon by the courts, so be careful when doing it! While most countries award attorney fees to the party that wins a lawsuit, this is rare in the United States, but is becoming more popular. Especially for lawsuits that have no basis, judges are becoming increasingly strict, punishing Attorneys and Plaintiffs who are suing others just for the sake of hoping that the other party won’t want to spend $10,000 on attorneys fees to defend themselves, and just hand over a few thousand to make the suit go away. Aside from the obvious – the practice is unethical – you may end up paying the attorneys fees for the people you sue, and you are going to develop a bad reputation with the court system which will not help should you ever have a legitimate case that you need to go to court.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  91. Re: Suing Google

    by Wanda – Aug 30th, 2008 @ 1:25am

    Sure enough SEOing has become so important I myself would be afraid to do any sueing against such a corp as Google.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  92. Stop The Lawsuits

    by Paul Williams – Sep 10th, 2008 @ 3:47pm

    everyone should take a break. read www.quickextenderpro.com and learn something.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  93. don’t loose

    by Timmy Carter – Sep 30th, 2008 @ 9:45pm

    That seems to be bad one to loose.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  94. Jeeeez

    by Bikinis – Oct 8th, 2008 @ 1:53pm

    Why don’t they pass these bullsh!t cases off before they hit the court? Seems like a waste of time, it’s like asking a stranger to take a picture of you whilst your on holiday; then suing the stranger for taking a bad shot of you. Haha. Seems weird.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  95. Safe Sex

    by Sex Toys – Dec 11th, 2008 @ 6:59am

    It is rather upsetting what google does sometimes with its SEO management. Sometimes it takes a long time for the SEO to begin working, in fact it could take several months. There’s not much you can do really but check out this Online Sex Shop Here you can find some of the best Sex Toys as holiday gifts for your partner. If you’re unstatisfied with your penis size, don’t forget to also check out our Penis Extenders that are top notch and guarantee results within three months!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)


  96. Re: Suing Google Because Your Google Site Ranking Suck

    by Barnlady1966 – Dec 16th, 2008 @ 1:54pm

    Google does offer a tool called WebMaster Tools. It tells you what the google bots see, and gives the site owner a heads up of potential problems. If you keep on top of things, you are usually okay. As for those offering valuable links-perhaps inserting some of the content you are linking to would help you with your google ranking.

Bush almost gets wacked!

December 16, 2008

)

I know we have all seen it but I just couldn't resist :)

December 12, 2008
Google Releases Chrome Out of Beta

In early September, Google launched a new product: a web browser named Chrome. Like most of Google’s products, it was released into beta, which basically means the product could be (and was) imperfect but they kinda sorta don’t have to take credit for it.

But 14 updates and 10 million users later, Google Chrome gets to shine in all of its glory, without that pesky little beta tag holding it back.

With its new beta-less state comes the 15th update and here’s what to expect, via the Official Google Blog:

* Better stability and performance of plug-ins (particularly video). Google improved the performance of video and audio and fixed a bunch of the bugs that existed during the beta period.
* Faster than ever Since the first beta, the V8 JavaScript engine runs 1.4 times faster on the SunSpider benchmark and 1.5 times faster on the V8 benchmark. Google says Chrome will get even faster in the future.
* Bookmark manager Better bookmark features were a top request Chrome users made to Google. It’s now easier to switch your bookmarks in other browsers over to Chrome.
* Privacy controls Features related to privacy are grouped in one spot with detailed explanations.

Have you tried the beta-less Chrome? Let us know your impressions in the comments.

Posted by Nathania Johnson at December 12, 2008 8:58 AM

Google vs. Everyone

December 10, 2008

Google is the 600-pound gorilla: the company that no one wants to see build a competing product. Google dominates many of the markets it enters, whether by building a superior product or acquiring one. But Google isn’t perfect: in some areas, they come out behind. Today, Mashable takes an in-depth look at 10 markets where Google wants to win.

searchversusgoogle.PNG

Google became the Internet’s biggest company by dominating what has become the web’s biggest market segment – online search and paid text links. Google claims a dominating 56% market share in search (Nielsen/NetRatings, May 2007) , but that hasn’t stopped dozens (probably hundreds) of companies from trying to grab a piece of the action. Most of the major search engines also come with their own advertising system, while a few startups actually rely on Google to serve up paid text ads.

Yahoo – Once the web’s biggest search engine, Yahoo still handles a reported 21.5% of searches worldwide. The company’s much anticipated but delayed Panama system for text ads has finally gone live, with early results pointing to better click through rates.

MSN – While rumors of Microsoft acquiring Yahoo have persisted (and been discredited in the same breath), the company’s Live Search product remains number three.

Ask.com – As the crown jewel of the IAC network of sites, Ask.com has received rave reviews, including Walt Mossberg of the Wall Street Journal declaring, “Google deserves credit for universal search, which I’m sure will get better. But Ask’s new design is much more compelling and well worth a try.” Nonetheless, Ask.com is a distant fourth in the race for search dominance.

Eurekster – Social search engine Eurekester is built around users tagging and promoting the best results. The company also markets the “Swicki” platform allowing online communities to create their own vertical search engines for users.

Rollyo – This search engine allows you to create a personalized search engine. With Rollyo, you set up a “search roll” which searches only from sites you specify, in the hope of providing you with only content you trust. Additionally, you can opt to share your search rolls with others.

Quintura – Visual search engine Quintura lets you search visually, presenting you with tag clouds relating to your search terms. As we noted in “Google Labs: A Look Under the Hood”, Google is experimenting with contextual search that shows related searches side-by-side with your original query.

Mahalo – Recently launched Mahalo is a commercialized Wikipedia of sorts, paying people to create pages on thousands of topics and continually update the results. Each content creator also gets their own profile pages where you can see the pages to which they have contributed.

Powerset – Much hyped Powerset hasn’t launched yet, but intends to build a natural language search engine that could change the way people find things online. The company has raised significant venture capital that has already valued PowerSet at more than $40 million.

Wikiasari – As part of his for-profit company, Wikia, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales looks to create the world’s largest human-powered search engine. The project is still in development, but with Wikipedia now one of the world’s largest web sites, it has an opportunity to grab a piece of the market.

Image Search – In addition to text queries, Google faces a variety of competitors in image search, including all of the usual suspects plus upstarts like Pixsy, Picsearch, and Yotophoto. We previously covered the image search competitors after Google proved victorious in a court battle over the thumbnailing of images.

Our Take: Google is the dominant player here, but we should remember that less than a decade ago, Yahoo owned search. Competition from both big web companies and well-funded startups will force Google to remain focused on continuing to innovate in search.

googleversusa.PNG

With AdWords the most dominant player in paid search, Google is looking to take the same system of aligning buyers and sellers to other forms of advertising, including web banner ads, radio, print, and mobile. Through acquisitions and several homegrown initiatives, the company is now lined up against dozens of other companies competing for ad dollars both online and off.

Contextual Advertising

Thousands of companies have built a business around Google’s contextual advertising platform that matches text ads to web site content. While AdSense dominates this market, all of the big players have competing offerings, as well as a few specialty outfits. In its most recent quarter, AdSense accounted for $1.35 billion in revenue for Google.

Yahoo Publisher Network – YPN still claims to be in Beta, but offers a very similar product to AdSense. Publishers create an account and cut and paste code to their site, and Yahoo serves up ads relating to the content of the page.

MSN AdCenter – Microsoft offers its AdCenter platform to advertisers looking for exposure in Microsoft Live searches and on other MSN Properties. Currently Microsoft does not provide an open system for other web sites to serve AdCenter ads, although the company does sell advertising for Facebook. Meanwhile, Google powers the search and contextual advertising on MySpace.

Ask.com Sponsored Listings – Ask.com recently launched an AdSense competitor, going after one of Google’s perceived weaknesses – a lack of transparency in terms of telling publishers what their cut of revenue is.

MIVA – Formerly known as FindWhat.com, a popular search engine in the first Internet boom, MIVA focuses on a variety of advertising options for publishers, including contextual product MIVA MC.

Kanoodle – Kanoodle offers a solution for publishers that want to run ads next to their own search results. It’s a subsidiary of Seavast, an online marketing conglomerate.

AdBrite – Offering a marketplace of sorts, AdBrite allows publishers to place text ads on their site and have advertisers buy them directly at a fixed price. They also allow you to set a floor price and run ads from a competing network (such as AdSense) when that price can’t be beaten.

Our Take: Until someone proves they can pay more than Google and still make a profit, AdSense will likely be the preferred contextual ad provider for Web publishers. However, there are only so many ads to go around, so there is also a place for competitors with strong offerings.

Online Display Advertising

With its acquisition of DoubleClick in April, Google set off a buying spree in the online ad space. In the weeks that followed, Yahoo snapped up Right Media, Microsoft bought aQuantive, and 24/7 Real Media was taken out by WPP Group. In addition to the DoubleClick purchase, Google has increasingly been integrating graphical advertising into its AdSense platform for web publishers. While it remains to be seen how exactly Google will integrate DoubleClick, the company is positioned to take a big slice of the online display advertising market, alongside these competitors:

Right Media – Acquired by Yahoo for $680 million, Right Media offers web publishers both a web-based ad management system and a marketplace called RMX Direct where advertisers can compete for publisher inventory.

aQuantive – The biggest acquisition in the history of Microsoft, aQuantive is the parent company of several online advertising outfits, including Razorfish, Atlas, and Drive. The company offers both technology for managing advertising and services for aligning buyers with web publishers.

Advertising.com – AOL was actually one of the first big players to move in on display ad networks, acquiring Advertising.com in 2004 for $435 million, a steal given the price tags of recent online advertising deals. Advertising.com claims their network of publishers reaches more than 85% of online users.

Valueclick – The biggest remaining independent ad network, Valueclick owns a wide variety of online ad properties, including Fastclick (banner ads), Commission Junction (affiliate advertising), and PriceRunner (comparison shopping). Wall Street currently values the company at $3 billion.

Tribal Fusion – Tribal Fusion is an ad network serving an estimated 19 billion monthly impressions. They provide advertisers with a variety of topical channels on which to target their ads.

24/7 Real Media – A provider of both technology and one of the Web’s largest banner advertising networks, 24/7 Real Media was acquired by global advertising agency WPP Group in May for $649 million. The company was founded all the way back in 1994.

Our Take: DoubleClick works with most of the web’s largest publishers, providing Google with new relationships to not only sell display ads, but increase AdWords usage. Google’s main competitors have tried to keep up, but the company has clearly positioned itself to take the lead in this category.

Other Ad Formats – Broadcast, Print, In-Game

In print, Google has extended its AdWords platform to allow you to bid on ads in major newspapers. In broadcast, Google acquired dMarc, a company that aligns radio advertisers and stations. For in-game advertising, the company acquired AdScape, a small startup. Competitors abound in all three segments, primarily in the form of the status quo of buying ads directly from the newspapers and radio stations with whom you want to advertise. Meanwhile, here is how a few key players are attacking these markets:

Microsoft – In May, Microsoft acquired Massive Incorporated, which has deals with major gaming companies like Electronic Arts to provide in-game ads.

IGA Worldwide – The largest independent in-game ad network, IGA places ads in popular titles like Counter Strike and works with major advertisers like T-Mobile and Intel.

Linden Labs – As the operator of virtual world Second Life, Linden Labs has attracted major brands like Pontiac, Dell, and Coca Cola to its “game” with mixed results, including several incidents of virtual vandalism.

Bid4Spots – An online auction of sorts for last minute buying of radio advertising across the US.

SWMX Radio – Provides tools that allow radio stations to manage their advertising inventory, while offering a marketplace for advertisers to buy air time.

Newspaper National Network – Jointly owned by 24 of the nation’s largest newspapers and the Newspaper Association of America, Newspaper National Network connects advertisers directly with some of the largest newspapers in the US. The company also helps sell inventory for newspaper’s online versions.

Nationwide Newspapers – An ad agency specializing in placement of both display and classified ads in newspapers across the US, including mailers like the Penny Saver and college newspapers. Nationwide Newspapers claims a circulation of up to 60 million papers weekly.

Our Take: As the manufacturer of Xbox, Microsoft has a leg up on in-game advertising. Meanwhile, print and broadcast are notoriously slow to adopt new technologies, so it will likely take Google some time to gain traction in this area, although acquiring dMarc certainly gave them a head start. With Google clearly intent on spreading its advertising platform to the offline world, more acquisitions are likely in the space.

googlevvideo.PNG

Google responded to the rather lackluster performance of homegrown Google Video by purchasing market leader YouTube for $1.6 billion in November 2006. While Google also inherited the legal headaches including a $1 billion lawsuit from Viacom, the purchase instantly made Google the #1 player in online video by a landslide. Nonetheless, dozens of companies have received funding in this space, and the other big players have also launched competing products:

Metacafe – This startup offers a similar video sharing experience to YouTube, with a focus on the male audience. Metacafe has been a rumored acquisition target of Microsoft and Yahoo.

MySpace Video – MySpace launched its own video sharing service last year that integrates tightly with user profiles, allowing users to instantly add videos to their space with no need for copying and pasting embed codes. Recently, this became MySpaceTV, which has been labeled as a “YouTube clone”.

Yahoo Video – Yahoo offers a fairly standard video sharing service with tagging, favorites, featured videos, etc. Yahoo also acquired online video editing service JumpCut in September ’06.

Blip.tv – Blip.tv is designed for serious video bloggers, offering tools for uploading high quality video, inserting ads, and maintaining a feed so fans can keep up with your show.

Revver – Originally Revver was the first video site to offer a revenue share with users, but others including YouTube have since followed suit. Beyond the financial arrangements, Revver offers a fairly standard video sharing experience, showcasing recent videos, most watched, and editor’s picks.

Dailymotion – One of the most popular video sites (particularly in France), Dailymotion is comprised of a variety of channels that users can join, such as Extreme Sports, Funny, and Webcam. The site also includes privacy options for sharing videos with select family and friends.

See also: Video Toolbox: 150+ Online Video Tools and Resources

Our Take: While Google will spend plenty of time in the court room over copyright issues on YouTube, the company has the financial strength to fight off just about any lawsuit thrown its way and preserve a dominant position in online video. Meanwhile, niche players like Blip.tv have an opportunity to take advantage of the growing market for high quality user generated content.

googlevsblogging.PNG

Google was ahead of the game with blogging, acquiring Pyra Labs, parent company of Blogger, back in 2003. Last month, Google acquired FeedBurner, which is far away the dominant player in RSS feed management. Rounding out Google’s efforts to dominate the blogosphere is Blog Search, which the company developed in-house. While FeedBurner is the industry standard for feed management, there are dozens of blog software and search options. Here are a few key competitors:

WordPress – The preferred software package for serious bloggers, WordPress offers both an installable version at wordpress.org and a hosted product at wordpress.com. The company maintains an open platform allowing third-party developers to create plugins.

Six Apart – The biggest independent blog company, Six Apart owns the hosted Typepad platform, the installable Movable Type software package, the community-focused LiveJournal, and the recently launched Vox personal publishing solution.

Technorati – The largest search engine focused exclusively on blogs, Technorati monitors, organizes, and ranks the authority of the blogosphere. Recently, the site has had its share of bumps (technical glitches, key staff departures, etc.), and a recent move towards multimedia has taken the focus off the core product.

Sphere – This blog search engine also offers the popular “Sphere It” widget that allows bloggers to show related blogs from around the web on their sites, and earn a share of the revenue on advertising.

Pheedo – As Google looks to monetize FeedBurner, they go up against Pheedo, who specializes in RSS advertising. Pheedo is compatible with most feed management services, including FeedBurner, Typepad, and WordPress.

Our Take: News out of Blogger has been nearly non-existent since Google acquired it, and Blog Search is not nearly as reliable as Google’s main search engine. FeedBurner is dominant in RSS, but advertisers still have plenty of options for feed-based advertising. The blogosphere remains a healthy area for competition.

googlevmobile.PNG

Recently making headlines with its purchase of GrandCentral, mobile is an area Google has had its eyes on for a while. Google Labs features GOOG411, which goes up against a variety of companies looking to transition paid 411 services into an advertising-based model, while the company has also made acquisitions in the space including AdScape Media and Dodgeball. Here are some key players Google is up against for domination on your handset:

Jingle Networks – As the first mover in the space with 1-800-FREE-411, Jingle Networks is already up to a reported 3% of market share for 411 volume. GOOG411 is still in Google Labs, but presumably will use an AdWords-inspired system to allow advertisers access to user’s 411 queries.

Yahoo Mobile! – Yahoo has made major efforts in mobile, offering a comprehensive application designed for cell phones and PDAs. Yahoo! Go adds mobile widgets to the equation.

MSN Mobile – Microsoft offers a free mobile version of its search and popular web sites. Weather, news, sports, movie times, and more are all available via MSN Mobile.

InfoSpace – InfoSpace specializes in mobile content, providing applications for search, content, and commerce that are typically private labeled by other brands and carriers. The company claims more than 250 million WAP page views per month.

VoIP – While the GrandCentral acquisition gave Google a unique offering, dozens of other startups are creating innovative applications that will keep Google on its toes. Check out “The 7 Most Disruptive VoIP Services” for a few prime examples.

Our Take: Adoption of the mobile Internet in the US trails Europe and Asia, leaving the space wide open. Yahoo has a head start here, while specialists like InfoSpace and the VoIP value-added service companies know the market better than anyone. However, GOOG411 and Google SMS (search by text message) offer a compelling user experience that is perfect for advertising.

googlevsstart.PNG

Google Personalized Home has become iGoogle, going up against the likes of My Yahoo!, Netvibes, PageFlakes, and dozens of other companies that want you to start your online experience with them. We list a few of the top competitors here, but you should also check out “14 Personalized Homepages Compared, Feature by Feature” to get an overall view of the innovation taking place in this market.

My Yahoo! – The original dominant portal, Yahoo can still claim the most widely used start page on the web. The company has continued to upgrade the service in hopes of retaining users, adding the ability to drag and drop content items, subscribe to RSS feeds, and integrate other Yahoo services like mail, weather, and finance.

AOL – While its subscriber base continues to dwindle quarter by quarter, millions of people still start their Internet experience by signing on to AOL. However, Google powers AOL’s search, and Google took a 5 percent stake in the company back in 2005.

My Netscape – One of the early big names on the Internet, Netscape has moved on to become a Digg clone and a start page provider. The site still gets considerable traffic thanks to its iconic brand and AOL relationship.

Netvibes – The hottest startup in the start page space, Netvibes provides a beautiful drag and drop interface for organizing your start page content, and also allows you to pull in widgets from third-parties. The company recently launched Netvibes Universes, private label versions of its start page product that other companies like The Washington Post and USA Today offer to their users.

Our Take: If it wasn’t clear already, iGoogle solidifies Google’s quest to be more than a search engine and take up more minutes of the user’s online time. While the startups have proven most innovative in this space, Google can use its massive reach and brand cache to convert users to iGoogle. However, Yahoo has the advantage of more than a decade of start page experience, and convincing the average user to invest a few hours in changing services isn’t easy.

googlevscommunications.PNG

While Gmail dubiously maintains its “Beta” tag, Google’s email service put the company on the map in being much more than a search engine and going after the big boys. The company has also launched Gtalk in an effort to join the instant messaging space, though the product lags behind competitors in adoption. Maintaining webmail and instant messaging services requires massive amounts of manpower and hardware, making it for the most part a four-way race between the big boys: Yahoo, Microsoft, and AOL.

AOL – Millions of people remain attached to their AOL email addresses. AOL has made it easy to do, allowing users to keep their address even if they cancel their AOL accounts. This makes AOL.com’s webmail product one of the more popular, albeit less advanced email services. Meanwhile, AOL Instant Messenger (AIM) is a major player in IM, particularly in the US.

MSN – Microsoft owns the original big boy in webmail – Hotmail – which recently received a major facelift and became Windows Live Hotmail (see: “Face Off: Windows Live Hotmail versus Gmail”). MSN Messenger has a huge user base globally.

Yahoo! – Yahoo Mail recently upgraded to offer an Outlook-like interface that includes the ability to chat with Yahoo Messenger buddies from within your account (Gmail does this with Gtalk). Yahoo’s IM product is among the top commercially-run products.

Our Take: Don’t let the market share numbers deceive you; Google is a serious player in communications. The other three players have a head start thanks to longevity, but Gmail has become the email provider of choice for professionals, thanks to a clean interface, effective spam filtering, and offering the most storage space. Meanwhile, Gtalk faces a slightly bigger challenge, since users have entrenched buddy lists with the other services that make changing a hassle.

googlevssocialnetworking.PNG

While it can be argued that YouTube is one of the world’s biggest social networking sites in addition to being the #1 video site, Google has been relatively quiet in the space. Friendster passed on a rumored $30 million Google bid back at the dawn of the social networking boom, while homegrown Orkut has enjoyed some success, primarily in South America. Readers of Mashable are no strangers to the hundreds of social networks looking to gain users, or at least, get acquired by Google.

Facebook – The hottest social network of ’07, Yahoo reportedly passed on buying Facebook for $1 billion last year, a bargain by today’s standards. With the Facebook Platform all the rage right now and an advertising deal with Microsoft, Google may be starting to feel it backed the wrong horse …

MySpace – News Corp made the savvy purchase of MySpace for $580 million back in 2005, just when the social networking leader was at the height of its exponential growth. The site has lost its swagger to Facebook in recent months, but still remains the biggest by far.

Bebo – Extremely popular in the UK, Bebo has been on the rise in ’07. It has also been the subject of acquisition rumors with Yahoo. The site receives praise for its privacy options.

AIM Pages – AOL made the logical move of extending AIM to include social networking through AIM Pages, enjoying moderate but not phenomenal success.

Windows Live Spaces – Microsoft’s social networking play is very youth-oriented, providing simple blogs and profiles to MSN users.

Yahoo! 360 – Yahoo’s biggest social networking effort has been criticized for not doing enough to integrate other Yahoo services and overlapping too much with other Yahoo products. The lack of success may be why Yahoo is always at the top of the rumored buyers list when other social networks go up for sale.

Our Take: The social networking space has proven fickle in its early history, with Friendster the early leader, MySpace the current dominant player, and Facebook on the rise looking to unseat MySpace. With YouTube already under its roof and one of the deepest pocketbooks in the industry, Google can sit back and wait for the right time to acquire one of the top social networks.

googlevsphotosharing.PNG

Google was relatively early to jump on the photo sharing bandwagon with the 2004 acquisition of Picasa, but the service has since been surpassed by rivals that do a better job of integrating with blogs and social networks. Here are the prime players:

Flickr – One of the darlings of Web 2.0, Yahoo deserves praise for acquiring Flickr in early 2005 before valuations became far steeper. The site is a favorite of techies and serious photographers, and is moving towards mainstream adoption as Yahoo closes Yahoo Photos in favor of Flickr.

Photobucket – By offering a free place to store photos that can be embedded on social networks, Photobucket became one of the most highly trafficked sites on the Web. While MySpace briefly blocked Photobucket, it recently decided to acquire the company for an estimated $250 million.

Zooomr – This startup receives a lot of hype, but is also becoming the choice of some high end photographers and giving Flickr some competition. We compared the two in “Face-off: Flickr versus Zooomr Mark III” after Zooomr’s latest round of enhancements.

BayImg – The Pirate Bay provides free uncensored image hosting for files up to 100MB. Given the big player’s need to appease advertisers by removing offensive content, it’s an interesting alternative that has some traction.

For a look at dozens of other players in the online photo space, check out “90+ Online Photography Tools and Resources”.

Our Take: With a fairly dominant image search product, Google doesn’t really need to move into the high maintenance area of photo storage and sharing. However, with the company expanding into display advertising, which is favored on many photo sharing sites, Google may become interested should the right company become available.

googlevsoffice.PNG

With the acquisition of Writely, which has since been merged into Google Docs & Spreadsheets, and the launch of a PowerPoint competitor imminent, version 1 of the Google office suite is nearly complete. While the company has a long way to go to match the feature set of the ever dominant Microsoft Office, it has Redmond moving fast to market web-based versions of its core products. Several startups are also working on word processing, spreadsheet, and presentation software to compete with Microsoft.

Microsoft – With Word, Excel, Powerpoint, and Outlook the entrenched franchises of nearly every personal computer on earth, Microsoft Office is a mighty foe to take on. While it is by no means Google’s core business yet, they are clearly putting pressure on Microsoft to remain innovative in the office arena.

Zoho – This well-funded startup has a full office suite of its own, with products including Zoho Writer, Zoho Sheet, and Zoho Show. Many of the company’s products are free.

Open Office – The free, open source office project that originates with Microsoft foe Sun Microsystems includes word processing, spreadsheets, presentations and more, and is designed to be compatible with as many operating systems and programs as possible.

Our Take: Microsoft’s dominance in office software stems from dominance in operating systems, a market it still controls. However, Google Docs & Spreadsheets’ web-based, collaborative approach is very lightweight and useful for certain tasks. While it will take years to build a product that offers the full functionality of Microsoft Office, Google is the best-positioned company by far to build a viable competitor if it wants to.

THE FUTURE

As the most watched, scrutinized, and reported-on company in the web space, Google’s every move is analyzed by competitors big and small. Its rapid expansion into areas beyond search and seemingly insatiable appetite for acquisitions has the company strongly positioned to dominate numerous key parts of the Internet. However, we should be reminded that not everything Google touches turns to gold; for example, the demise of Google Answers and the demotion of Froogle. Stay tuned for what are sure to be hundreds of announcements in the years to come.

Google Was Almost Charged with Web Monopoly?

December 4th, 2008 by Arnold Zafra | 1 Comment

submit_url = “http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-was-almost-charged-with-web-monopoly/8110/”;

For those who still remember the sudden decision of Google to back away from their paid search ad deal with Yahoo and still wondering the real reason behind it, we finally got our answer. Prosecutor Sandy Litvack who was assigned to the case told the AM Law Daily that, the Department of Justice was three hours aways from charging Google with antitrusts lawsuit, and was close to being branded as a monopolist had Google not announced that the deal was cancelled.

David Drummond, Google’s chief legal counsel who made the cancellation of the deal last month somehow gave a hint when when he said that Google is cancelling the deal to avoid any protracted legal battle but did not categorically say that the DOJ is about to file a lawsuite against Google.

Here’s what Google posted on its official blog when the cancellation of the search ad deal was announced:

However, after four months of review, including discussions of various possible changes to the agreement, it’s clear that government regulators and some advertisers continue to have concerns about the agreement. Pressing ahead risked not only a protracted legal battle but also damage to relationships with valued partners. That wouldn’t have been in the long-term interests of Google or our users, so we have decided to end the agreement.

And here’s what the prosecutor told the AM Law Daily:

We were going to file the complaint at a certain time during the day. We told them we were going to file the complaint at that time of day. Three hours before, they told us they were abandoning the agreement.

. . . It would have ended up also alleging that Google had a monopoly and that [the advertising pact] would have furthered their monopoly.

Now that the coast has been cleared. And with the new government, would Google go back to the negotiating table and appeal for a reconsideration with the DOJ to let them proceed with the deal? Would the DOJ have a change of heart especially since Google’s Schmidt was very vocal with Google’s support for president-elect Obama?

Published by Lars Hilse at 8:55 pm under Customer Care, Internationalization

Screen Resolution of Website VisitorsNothing is more nerve-wrecking than having to scroll on a website. In fact it is a key factor for me to leave a site the instance I arrive.

Avoiding this is obvious to most of us, but hardly anyone knows the majorities screen resolution.

The pie-chart on the left points out a blue, 44,46% big field which indicates 1024×768 pixel resolution. This trend is continuous throughout a significant amount of the websites I follow.

But don’t be prejudiced about your users. An older demographic will most likely tend towards a higher resolution because the appearance of the site will conceivably be bigger. While younger users will most likely tend towards a smaller resolution because of the billions of other applications they will have to monitor aside from the website they are currently reading. Furthermore, we have to think of national issues in reference to visitors from less wealthy countries, who will most likely not have access to high resolution displays.

The ultimate compromise would seemingly consist of creating a variable width template which would take care of these issues once and for all, right? Wrong, because you (or your designers) will experience devastating limitations in terms of creativity and enriching your web site’s content with appropriate imagery. This resulting out of the fact that the images would either be not wide enough for big displays or too small for mobile devices.

The conclusion and only way to be least screwed is to take a fixed width design which is under 1000px of width and to provide barely enough content to make it obsolete to scroll vertically.

Did we forget something? Oh, yes… the constantly growing amount of mobile users. The simplest way would be to create an alternative template or landing page for them with browser recognition.

Now we’ve got pretty much everybody served and happy -)